United for Tiospaye (Families):
The Collaborative Hocoka (Circle)
for Wicozani (the Well-Being) of
Native Wakanyeja (Sacred Children)
Complete Child Welfare
service array Assessment Process and Resource
development plan
|
RFP #: 001 |
BUYERS: United
for Tiospaye (Families): The
Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) For
Wicozani (the Well-Being) of Native
Wakanyeja (Sacred Children) |
PHONE: 605 391-6216 |
|
FIRM NAME: |
|
AUTHORIZED
SIGNATURE: |
|
|
ADDRESS: |
|
TYPE OR PRINT NAME: |
|
|
CITY/STATE: |
|
TELEPHONE NO: |
|
|
ZIP (9 DIGIT): |
|
FAX NO: |
|
|
FEDERAL TAX ID#: |
|
E-MAIL: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTACT NAME: |
|
TELEPHONE NO: |
|
|
FAX NO: |
|
E-MAIL: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
GENERAL INFORMATION
1.1
BACKGROUND & HISTORY
The Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) was formed to bring
together stakeholders in South Dakota—the Tribes, the South Dakota Division of
Child Protection Services, families, youth, contractors, and other partners—who
are committed to improving outcomes for South Dakota’s Native children.
The Collaborative
Hocoka (Circle) works in three broad areas:
· setting an agenda for addressing the
needs and improving the outcomes of Native children and families in the child
and family services system;
· developing and advocating for new
service strategies to address the needs of Native children and families; and
· monitoring, supporting, and
reassessing these activities and maintaining accountability for Indian Child Welfare
Act (ICWA) implementation and compliance and for improved Native child and
family outcomes in child protection.
As the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle), we set the agenda for
what needs to be done, and begin by focusing on nine areas:
1. ICWA Implementation and Compliance:
The Collaborative Hocoka (Circle)
takes as one of its main responsibilities overseeing ICWA implementation and
compliance, including the State of
Therefore, the Collaborative Hocoka
(Circle):
·
reviews
annually all the specific recommendations of the Commission Report and monitors how these recommendations are being
implemented;
·
identifies
needed improvements in meeting these recommendations and develops action plans
to address them;
·
provides
annual feedback on ICWA implementation and compliance to South Dakota’s state
governance (including, but not limited to, Tribal Chairpersons, Child
Protection Services, Governor’s Office, legislative committees, etc.); and
·
promotes
special ICWA training for court advocates (attorneys) and judges, including
tribal judges.
2.
Legislative Review and Development:
Another of the Collaborative Hocoka
(Circle)’s main responsibilities is legislative review and
development—specifically proposed or existing legislation that impacts Native
child welfare.
Therefore, the Circle, in
partnership with the leadership of the Division of Child Protection Services:
·
regularly
reviews proposed legislation and monitors existing legislation and related
activities as they impact on Native children and families, and
·
advocates
as necessary and appropriately;
·
develops
procedures and protocols for these reviews and monitoring that clarifies for
all four kinds of Circle members (Tribes, State, family members and youth, and
providers) and communicates these procedures and protocols with them so that
all parties know how to proceed with proposed legislation;
·
develops
proactively with the Circle’s four members needed new legislation and advocates
for the legislation’s passage as necessary and appropriate; and
·
develops
an annual plan for legislative relationships for example, regular meetings with
legislators and legislative staff who work on Indian child welfare.
3.
Services and Stability:
In order to keep Native children
out of child protective services and/or to safely return them to stable
families,
Therefore, the Collaborative Hocoka
(Circle):
·
regularly
assesses the adequacy of the service array in the seven regions, through the
regional Collaboratives;
·
assesses
the accessibility of child and family services and supports in terms of
geography, culture, and language;
·
assists
tribes in assessing their own service arrays as requested;
·
promotes
the sharing of resources; and
·
addresses
funding issues, including IV-E contracts, required infrastructure for IV-E
contracting, staffing, lack of service providers, and funding for tribal
courts.
4.
Placement Resources:
When children need an out-of-home
placement to be safe, a variety of placement resources are needed.
Therefore, the Collaborative Hocoka
(Circle):
·
promotes
the use of Family Group Decision-Making or family meetings to plan the
placement;
·
promotes
the identification, preparation, and support of relative resource families;
·
supports
the recruitment and retention of Native American resource families (relative,
foster, and adoptive families) for Native children, with special emphasis on
adolescents and children with special needs; and
·
advocates
for culturally appropriate services in other placement resources (e.g., group
homes, residential treatment facilities).
5.
Education, Training, and Public
Relations:
The Collaborative Hocoka (Circle)
acknowledges the need for education of the general public, and for addressing
the training needs of resource families, tribal staff, and public and private
sector staff.
Therefore, the Collaborative Hocoka
(Circle):
·
promotes
public education about resource families:
·
The
different types of out-of-home family placements (relative, foster, adoptive).
·
Requirements
to become resource families (relative, foster, adoptive).
·
Funding
available to help meet the needs of children in placement.
·
Positive
contributions that resource families make to children and to the community.
·
promotes
training for resource families, including cultural training;
·
monitors
the implementation of the Child Protection Services Statewide Strategic Plan,
particularly as it relates to education and training of resource families,
kinship families, and public, tribal and private agency child protection staff.
6.
Regional Collaboratives Support:
From the beginning, discussions
about creating the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle), there was consensus regarding
the need to create parallel regional structures.
Each plays a critical role:
·
regional
Collaboratives identify service needs and report how systems are working at the
local level,
·
while
the statewide Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) sees the picture across the state
and helps set statewide priorities.
·
Collaboration
across these levels supports effective cross-system collaboration at the case
level, so children and families receive integrated services in day-to-day
practice.
·
Regional
Collaboratives are particularly important as we implement the strategic plan
for the recruitment and retention of resource families, including Native
families.
The Collaborative Hocoka (Circle)
takes as one of its main responsibilities the creation and support of a child
welfare collaborative in each of
7.
Resource Development and Finance:
As the Collaborative Hocoka
(Circle) has grown and matured, it has become clear that we need to develop
resources to support the important work of the Circle and the regional
collaboratives, as well as to manage and sustain the human and financial
resources we have from our four kinds of Circle members (Tribes, State, family
members and youth, and providers) and from other benefactors.
Therefore, the Collaborative Hocoka
(Circle):
·
seeks
out additional needed human and fiscal resources from benefactors who are
committed to the innovative collaboration we are developing through the Circle
in order to support the work of the Circle and the regional Collaboratives;
·
develops
and implements plans to sustain the Circle’s human and financial resources;
·
challenges
the four kinds of Circle members to continue their human, in-kind, and
financial contributions to the Circle; and
·
manages
the Circle’s fiscal resources by monitoring financial activities and creating
an annual financial report.
8.
Reconciliation[1]/Trust
Building:
Part of the Collaborative Hocoka
(Circle)’s maturation process has been the realization and consensus that in
order to work together and accomplish our mission, vision, and activities, we
must constantly tend and nurture trust building among the four kinds of Circle
members. Indeed, we have
learned—sometimes painfully—that trust building must be an explicit and a
continuous process throughout the life and work of the Circle, particularly in
the context of the history of the relationship between public child welfare and
the tribal nations in the
Therefore, the Collaborative Hocoka
(Circle):
·
commits
itself at the level of the Circle to build trust in Native child welfare
through truth telling, acknowledging, restoring, and relating;
·
assists
the regional Collaboratives as they are ready developmentally in building trust
at the local level;
·
promotes
trust building in child welfare among the four kinds of Circle members and
other community Stakeholders across the State of
9. Membership Recruitment and Retention:
Continued human investment in the
work of the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) and its committees and special
projects does not just happen spontaneously.
The Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) must be proactive in ensuring full
participation by all four kinds of its members as well as by other community
stakeholders throughout
Therefore, the Collaborative Hocoka
(Circle):
1.2
PURPOSE OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
(RFP)
The purpose of this request for proposal is to select a contractor(s)
for the planning, facilitating, and implementing of the Service Array Assessment
Process and Resource Development Planning Process in
The rationale for this process is:
a) to improve outcomes for children and
families in child welfare, a range of services and supports are needed, from
preventative to remedial,
b) services and supports must be
available, accessible, and of good quality or “reasonable efforts” have not
been made,
c) creating a viable, continuing
community stakeholder group for the jurisdiction.
Contractors may submit proposals to provide the required
services identified under RFP 001.
This RFP is designed to provide interested contractors with
sufficient basic information to submit proposals meeting minimum requirements,
but is not intended to limit a proposal's content or exclude any relevant or
essential data. Contractors are at
liberty and are encouraged to expand upon the specifications to evidence
service capability under any agreement.
All participating contractors shall
agree to comply with all of the conditions, requirements and instructions of
this proposal as stated or implied herein. Should anything have been omitted
from this proposal that is necessary to a clear understanding of its
requirements, or should it appear that various instructions are in conflict,
the contractor shall secure written instructions from the Collaborative Hocoka
(Circle) contact person at least forty-eight hours prior to the time and date
of the opening of the proposal.
1.3
SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES (SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
|
RFP Publication |
1/4/2008 |
|
Deadline for
Submission of Written Inquiries |
1/18/2008 |
|
Responses to Contractor
Questions |
1/25/2008 |
|
Proposal Submission-
postmarked by |
2/15/2008 |
|
Oral
Presentations/discussions (if required) |
2/29/2008 |
|
Anticipated Award
Decision/Contract Negotiation |
3/14/2008 |
All proposals must be completed
and received by the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) contact person by the date
and time indicated in the Schedule of Activities.
Proposals received after the deadline will be late and ineligible for
consideration.
An original and two identical
copies of the proposal shall be submitted.
1.5
CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, INELIGIBILITY
AND VOLUNTARY EXCLUSION – LOWER TIER COVERED TRANSACTIONS
By
signing and submitting this proposal, the contractor certifies that neither it
nor its principals is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment,
declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation, by any Federal
department or agency, from transactions involving the use of Federal
funds. Where the contractor is unable to
certify to any of the statements in this certification, the bidder shall attach
an explanation to their offer.
1.6
NON-DISCRIMINATION STATEMENT
The
Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) requires that all contractors, provide a
statement of non-discrimination. By
signing and submitting their proposal, the contractor certifies they do not
discriminate in their employment practices with regard to race, color, creed,
religion, age, sex, ancestry, national origin or disability.
1.7
MODIFICATION OR WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSALS
Proposals
may be modified or withdrawn by the contractor prior to the established due
date and time.
No oral, telephonic, telegraphic or facsimile responses
or modifications to informal, formal bids, or Request for Proposals will be
considered.
1.8
CONTRACTOR INQUIRIES
Contractors
may make written or email inquiries concerning this RFP to obtain clarification
of requirements. No inquiries will be
accepted after the date and time indicated in the Schedule of Activities. Email inquiries must be sent to Russ Conti at
rconti@myway.com
with the subject line “RFP #001.”
Inquiries may also be faxed to (605) 867-5941. If
inquiries are submitted by mail the envelope should be addressed to: Russ
Conti, Services & Stability Committee Co-Chair,