Date:  January 7, 2008

 

United for Tiospaye (Families):

 

The Collaborative Hocoka (Circle)

for WIcozani (the Well-being)

of South Dakota’s Native Wakanyeja (sacred Children)

 

The Charter of the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle)

 

Amended by the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle), September 14, 2007

Edited and Approved by the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) on September 14, 2007

Table of Contents

 

Background and History                                                                                           2

 

Name and Purpose                                                                                                   2

 

Mission and Vision Statement                                                                                 3

 

Principles and Values Guiding the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle’s) Work         3

 

Areas of Focus                                                                                                          4

 

A Commitment to Outcomes, Ownership of and Accountability for Results       8

 

Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) Membership                                                           9

 

Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) Leadership                                                           10

                                                                                                                                      

Meetings                                                                                                                   11

 

Annual Retreat/Enrichment/Education                                                                  12

 

Annual Report                                                                                                          12

 

Committees                                                                                                             13

 

Amendment Procedures                                                                                        13


Background and History

 

Recruitment and retention of Native American resource Tiospaye (families) has been a concern for both tribes and the South Dakota Division of Child Protection Services since the passage of the Indian Child Welfare Act (hereafter, ICWA). Although recruitment of Native resource Tiospaye (families) has had sporadic attention, in more recent years a focus has returned to this important issue and in 2002 a state-tribal foster and adoption work group was formed. Over the next year and a half, the group met to discuss continuing issues related to recruitment and retention; strategies to bridge barriers, including developing a brochure to address myths about being a resource family; and implementing a cooperative effort between State, Tribal, and private organizations, such as Casey Family Programs and Children’s Home Society.

 

Although initial attendance at the tribal-state work group meetings was good, by the fall 2003 meeting attendance had begun to dwindle. In late fall of 2004 at the Adopt-Us-Kids statewide strategic planning session, participants addressed issues related to recruitment and retention of all resource families in the state. The state-tribal foster and adoption work group was identified as key to improving recruitment and retention of Native resource families and the revitalization of the work group began. The National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational Improvement and Adopt-Us-Kids facilitated the next work group meeting in March 2005 at Chamberlain, SD. Thirty tribal and state representatives attended and decided, through a consensus of the work group, that it was time the work group evolved into a true collaborative of tribal and state partners. The group identified interim leaders and a scope of work—developing a mission statement, organizational structure, membership and by-laws—to begin the collaborative effort.

 

At the second meeting of the Tribal-State Collaborative in June 2005, these tasks became reality and the group named the collaborative United for Families: the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) for the Well-Being of South Dakota’s Native Children. In addition, the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle)’s structure and membership criteria were established. By September 2005, it was anticipated that the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) would be a formal entity with newly seated members who will tackle the recruitment, retention and child welfare concerns of its members.

 

This document summarizes all the decisions made to create and implement the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) and serves as a living charter to guide the work of the Circle.

Name and Purpose

 

The name of the organization shall be: United for Families: The Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) for the Well-Being of South Dakota’s Native Children.

 

The Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) was formed to bring together stakeholders in South Dakota—the Tribes, the South Dakota Division of Child Protection Services, families, providers, and other partners—who are committed to improving outcomes for South Dakota’s Native children.

Mission and Vision Statement

Mission

 

The Native children and families of South Dakota who come into the child protection system need and deserve better results in the areas of safety, stability, and well-being. Therefore, we have come together—families and youth, providers, Tribes, State and local agencies, and other community stakeholders—to create a formal Collaborative dedicated to achieving better outcomes. To ensure that these results can be achieved, each member commits to functional, trusting, working relationships with each other and with other community stakeholders, and to constantly strive to improve those relationships.

 

As we work together for South Dakota’s Native children and families, we strive to protect those children through a system that:

 

Vision

 

We, the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle), envision a system of child and family services and supports in South Dakota that ensures that each Native child is safe and thriving in a permanent, appropriate home; that families are supported in their communities; and that communities themselves take responsibility for ensuring that this vision becomes a reality.

 

Principles and Values Guiding the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle)’s Work

 

The following principles and values guide our work:

·        We acknowledge the recognition of tribal sovereignty by the State of South Dakota Department of Social Services and the members of the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle). The inherent sovereign power of Indian tribes and nations to govern themselves predates the establishment of the Unites States of America, and was recognized by the United States in numerous Treaties made with the bands of the Great Sioux Nation, notably the Fort Laramie Treaties of 1851 and 1868. Because the integrity of our families and the relationship of the coming generations to their tribes is central to the exercise of tribal sovereignty, the State and the nine Tribes of South Dakota pledge to recognize and respect each other's sovereignty and to conduct the work of the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) on a nation-to-nation basis.

 

·        We work together to promote trusting relationships within the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) and with other community partners, building on and using the strengths, ideas, and resources of each member.

·        We collectively assume responsibility for achieving better outcomes for Native children and families in South Dakota.

·        Whenever possible, we promote a preventive approach by:

o       providing services and supports upfront to prevent Native children and families from coming into the child protection system;

o       helping families understand their rights;

o       promoting parental empowerment and participation in a cultural context; and

o       moving children and families out of the system as soon as possible.

·        We work as a Circle to ensure that:

o       All services and supports provided in South Dakota are family-centered, culturally-based and individualized to meet the needs of the clients.

o       Families are engaged as full partners in defining their needs and goals and in achieving those goals. Families’ extended members and other informal sources of support are also engaged to keep children safe, in permanent homes, and achieving well-being.

o       All decisions regarding Native children are made in full compliance with the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) through collaboration between the Tribes, the State, and private agencies. When children need an out-of-home placement in order to be safe, relatives and other Native families are considered first.

o       Tribes are empowered to meet their own child and family service needs, including developing the resources and infrastructure to license Native resource families on and off the reservations.

o       Native children are able to maintain their own family, community, and cultural ties when they are in out-of-home placements, and even after termination of parental rights if that becomes necessary, through various services and supports such as mentoring by Native Americans, urban cultural centers, cultural family plans and agreements, transfer protocols, family group decision-making, and training.

·        Since so many Native children come into care as a result of alcohol abuse, all members of the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) demonstrate and promote a heightened sensitivity to this issue and its implications for outcomes for children.

Areas of Focus

The Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) currently works in three broad areas:   

·        setting an agenda for addressing the needs and improving the outcomes of Native children and families in the child and family services system;

·        developing and advocating for new service strategies to address the needs of Native children and families; and

·        Monitoring, supporting, and reassessing these activities and maintaining accountability for ICWA implementation and compliance and for improved Native child and family outcomes in child protection.

 

As the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle), we set the agenda for what needs to be done, and begin by focusing on nine areas:

1. ICWA Implementation and Compliance.

The Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) takes as one of its main responsibilities overseeing ICWA implementation and compliance, including the State of South Dakota ICWA Commission Report/Recommendations. Therefore, the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle):

·        receives feedback from the Collaboratives standing committees about ICWA implementation and compliance issues in their areas;

·        reviews annually all the specific recommendations of the Commission Report and monitors how these recommendations are being implemented;

·        identifies needed improvements in meeting these recommendations and develops action plans to address them;

·        provides annual feedback on ICWA implementation and compliance to South Dakota’s state governance (including, but not limited to, Tribal Chairpersons, Child Protection Services, Governor’s Office, legislative committees, etc.); and

·        promotes special ICWA training for court advocates (attorneys) and judges, including tribal judges.

2. Legislative Review and Development.

Another of the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle)’s main responsibilities is legislative review and development—specifically proposed or existing legislation that impacts Native child welfare.  Therefore, the Circle, in partnership with the leadership of the Division of Child Protection Services:

·        regularly reviews proposed legislation and monitors existing legislation and related activities as they impact on Native children and families, and advocates as necessary and appropriate;

·        develops procedures and protocols for these reviews and monitoring that clarifies for all four kinds of Circle members (Tribes, State, family members and youth, and providers) and communicates these procedures and protocols with them so that all parties know how to proceed with proposed legislation;

·        develops proactively with the Circle’s four members needed new legislation and advocates for the legislation’s passage as necessary and appropriate; and

·        develops an annual plan for legislative relationships (for example, regular meetings with legislators and legislative staff who work on Indian child welfare).

3. Services and Stability

In order to keep Native children out of child protective services and/or to safely return them to stable families, South Dakota needs a range of effective child and family services and supports. Therefore, the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle):

·        regularly assesses the adequacy of the service array in the seven regions, through the regional collaboratives;

·        assesses the accessibility of child and family services and supports in terms of geography, culture, and language;

·        assists tribes in assessing their own service arrays as requested;

·        promotes the sharing of resources; and

·        addresses funding issues, including IV-E contracts, required infrastructure for IV-E contracting, staffing, lack of service providers, and funding for tribal courts.

4. Placement Resources.

When children need an out-of-home placement to be safe, a variety of placement resources are needed. Therefore, the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle):

·        promotes the use of Family Group Decision-Making or family meetings to plan the placement;

·        promotes the identification, preparation, and support of relative resource families;

·        supports the recruitment and retention of Native American resource families (relative, foster, and adoptive families) for Native children, with special emphasis on adolescents and children with special needs; and

·        advocates for culturally appropriate services in other placement resources (e.g., group homes, residential treatment facilities).

5. Education, Training, and Public Relations.

The Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) acknowledges the need for education of the general public, and for addressing the training needs of resource families, tribal staff, and public and private sector staff. Therefore, the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle):

·        promotes public education about resource families:

o The different types of out-of-home family placements (relative, foster, adoptive).

o Requirements to become resource families (relative, foster, adoptive).

o Funding available to help meet the needs of children in placement.

o Positive contributions that resource families make to children and to the community.

·        promotes training for resource families, including cultural training;

·        monitors the implementation of the Child Protection Services Statewide Strategic Plan, particularly as it relates to education and training of resource families, kinship families, and public, tribal and private agency child protection staff.

6. Regional Collaboratives Support.

From the beginning discussions about creating the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle), there was consensus regarding the need to create parallel regional structures. Each plays a critical role: regional collaboratives identify service needs and report how systems are working at the local level, while the statewide Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) sees the picture across the state and helps set statewide priorities. Collaboration across these levels supports effective cross-system collaboration at the case level, so children and families receive integrated services in day-to-day practice. Regional collaboratives are particularly important as we implement the strategic plan for the recruitment and retention of resource families, including Native families.

 

The Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) takes as one of its main responsibilities the creation and support of a child welfare collaborative in each of South Dakota’s child protection service regions.

7. Resource Development and Finance.

As the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) has grown and matured, it has become clear that we need to develop resources to support the important work of the Circle and the regional collaboratives, as well as to manage and sustain the human and financial resources we have from our four kinds of Circle members (Tribes, State, family members and youth, and providers) and from other benefactors.  Therefore, the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle):

·  seeks out additional needed human and fiscal resources from benefactors who are committed to the innovative collaboration we are developing through the Circle in order to support the work of the Circle and the regional collaboratives;

·  develops and implements plans to sustain the Circle’s human and financial resources;

·  challenges the four kinds of Circle members to continue their human, in-kind, and financial contributions to the Circle; and

·  manages the Circle’s fiscal resources by monitoring financial activities and creating an annual financial report.

8. Reconciliation[1]/Trust Building.

Part of the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle)’s maturation process has been the realization and consensus that in order to work together and accomplish our mission, vision, and activities, we must constantly tend and nurture trust building among the four kinds of Circle members.  Indeed, we have learned—sometimes painfully—that trust building must be an explicit and a continuous process throughout the life and work of the Circle, particularly in the context of the history of the relationship between public child welfare and the tribal nations in the United States and in South Dakota.  We have also learned that if we take trust building for granted, we will suffer the consequences. 

 

Therefore, the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle):

 

·  commits itself at the level of the Circle to build trust in Native child welfare through truth telling, acknowledging, restoring, and relating;

·  assists the regional collaboratives as they are ready developmentally in building trust at the local level;

·  Promotes trust building in child welfare among the four kinds of Circle members and other community Stakeholders across the State of South Dakota.

 

9. Membership Recruitment and Retention.

 

Continued human investment in the work of the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) and its committees and special projects does not just happen spontaneously.  The Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) must be proactive in ensuring full participation by all four kinds of its members as well as by other community stakeholders throughout South Dakota, and proactive in retaining their participation after recruitment.  Therefore, the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle):

 

·  continuously works to ensure full participation and retention on the Circle of all four kinds of Circle members;

 

·  conducts an annual review with the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) of the participants of all the Circle’s committees (standing and ad hoc) and special projects to ensure full participation and retention on these bodies by all four kinds of members;

 

·  works proactively to recruit and retain the participation of other community stakeholders in South Dakota in the work of the Circle, its committees, and special projects (for example, public and private sector providers of child welfare services; mental health, substance abuse, and domestic violence service providers; educators, health care providers, home visiting program staff; court, legal, and law enforcement officials, including CASA volunteers; birth parents, family caregivers [foster, adoptive, and kinship] and youth; child abuse prevention advocates and staff; other key providers—for example, housing, food resources, transportation; elected officials and administrators, including legislators and legislative staff; media staff; and representatives of the business, faith and labor communities).

A Commitment to Outcomes, Ownership of and Accountability for Results

 

As the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) commits to improving results for Native children and families who come into child protection in South Dakota, it is critical that we focus on improved outcomes, own the results of our own efforts, and hold ourselves and the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) accountable for success. Therefore, at meetings of the Collaborative:

 

1.      The South Dakota Division of Child Protection Services presents :

·  current data on Native children and families in child protection services in South Dakota (relevant CFSR indicators: for example, the number of Native children currently in the system; how many are receiving in-home services, and in out-of-home placements; for those children in out-of-home placement, how many are in out-of-state care, institutional care, group care, kinship care, Native family foster care, non-Native family foster care, etc.; average length of time in out-of-home care, timeliness of achieving stability, etc.); and

·  The strategies in South Dakota’s Child and Family Services Plan and/or Program Improvement Plan addressed to improve outcomes for Native children and families.

2.      Based on this information, the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) identifies outcomes we want to improve for Native children, and the strategies we will promote to achieve this improvement.

3.      At each meeting, the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) reviews the most current data on Native children in child protection and implementation of the Child and Family Services Plan to see if our efforts and strategies should be modified.

4.      As we succeed in improving these outcomes, we will consider addressing others.

Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) Membership

The Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) is composed of up to 38 members representing Tribes, birth parents, family caregivers (foster, adoptive, kinship) and youth, State officials, providers, and other partners.

·        Tribes. There are nine tribes in South Dakota. Each tribe selects two representatives, using criteria developed by the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle), resulting in a tribal membership of 18 members. One of the two tribal representatives is the Tribal ICWA Director. In addition, each tribe selects one alternate who serves when either of the Tribe’s regular members is unable to attend a meeting.

·        Birth Parents, Family Caregivers (foster, adoptive, kinship), and Youth.  The Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) includes six birth parents, family caregivers, and youth. Three parents are selected from different tribes. Parents may be foster, adoptive, or kinship parents, or a birth parent who has been involved previously with the child protection system. In addition, the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) recruits three Native youth/alumni from different tribes between the ages of 18 and 25.

·        State Officials. Nine State officials are members of the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle): the Assistant Division Director of the Division of Child Protection Services, the ICWA Program Specialist, and one representative from each of South Dakota’s seven Child Protection Services regions. Regional representatives hold supervisory positions and represent their entire region.

·        Other Partner Representatives. Other partner representatives including the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Children’s Home Society, Lutheran Social Services, and the South Dakota Association of Residential Youth Care Providers are members of the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle).

 

Terms of Office

Terms of office are as follows:

·        State official members serve as long as they hold their positions.

·        Other partner representatives serve as long as their employers designate them.

·        Tribal members are appointed by their respective tribes and serve at the discretion of their leadership

·        Family members and youth serve as long as they are willing.

Vacancies

Should a membership position become vacant for any reason, the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) will initiate actions to refill the position, led by membership recruitment committee.

Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) Leadership

Leaders and Duties

 

All members of the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) are responsible for exercising leadership to achieve the purposes of the Circle. However, six persons comprise the elected leadership (Executive Committee) of the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle):

·        Two co-chairs/co-facilitators—one tribal representative and one state representative—preside over meetings. The co-chairs/co-facilitators also appoint any ad hoc committees that may be needed, and nominate members for standing committees; nominees must be approved by the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle).

·        Two alternate co-chairs/co-facilitators—one tribal representative and one state representative—preside over meetings when their counterparts are absent. The alternates can also assist the co-chairs/facilitators with their duties if so requested.

·        A recorder who takes minutes or causes minutes to be taken, and sends minutes, meeting agendas and other materials to members. The recorder also maintains an historical file of Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) documents and disseminates information needed by members and others through an e-newsletter or other vehicles.

·        A treasurer who serves ex-officio as the chair of the Resource Development and Finance Committee.

 

Elections

 

Leaders are elected by the members from the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) membership. Any regularly scheduled vacancies in leadership are filled at the first meeting in a new year. Leaders may also be reelected.

Terms of Office

 

All Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) leaders serve three-year terms of office which are staggered to ensure that there is not a complete turnover of leadership in any given year. The initial staggering is as follows: three-year terms—tribal co-chair/co-facilitator and the state alternate co-chair/co-facilitator; two-year terms—state co-chair/co-facilitator and tribal alternate co-chair/co-facilitator; one-year terms—the recorder and the treasurer.

Meetings

Attendance and Missed Meetings

All members of the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) are expected to attend and participate in each meeting. Members must not miss a meeting unless there is an emergency. A member missing a meeting must inform one of the co-chairs as soon as possible, and if a Tribal member, inform the alternate member who will attend the meeting in his or her place.

 

Members must RSVP to the recorder their planned attendance at upcoming meetings at least one month prior to the meeting. If a member is unable to attend a meeting, and has no alternate, he or she may request a colleague to attend the meeting and take information back to the member.

 

If a member misses more than one meeting, the Executive Committee or the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) will discuss his or her continuing membership. If the person wishes to remain a member, he or she must not miss another meeting.

Regular Meetings

The Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) meets four times a year, at the dates set at the first meeting of the new calendar year.

Special Meetings

The Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) and/or its Executive Committee have the authority to call special meetings as needed. At least one month's notice must be given to the members.

Quorum

A minimum of 20 members are needed for the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) to conduct business.

Notice

The recorder is responsible for providing written notice of an upcoming, regular meeting at least six weeks in advance.

 

Discussion and Voting

The Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) strives to build trust among the members, discussions at meetings will be characterized by respect, trust, honesty, and professionalism (see the Principles and Values section). Meetings will provide opportunities for members to brainstorm with all ideas treated with respect.

 

Proof that the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) is a true collaborative is that most decisions are reached by consensus. This is the preferred way for all decision-making. However, when consensus cannot be achieved, voting can be used. Each member has one vote. Should serious conflict develop within the Circle, the Collaborative has the option of seeking the assistance of a mediator acceptable to all parties.

Location and Hours of Meetings

Because Pierre is central in the State, ordinarily meetings will be held in the capital city. However, the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) has the authority to change locations at will. A rotating schedule of meeting locations can allow members to become familiar with other locations and their needs (for example, meetings on tribal land or at regional collaborative sites).

 

Because of the distances members must travel to meet, meetings begin at 1PM on the first day and adjourn at noon on the following day.

Annual Retreat/Enrichment/Education

The Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) has learned that it must continuously focus on its development and maturation and that of its members in order to provide leadership in Native child welfare in South Dakota.  The Circle has had to add additional time to its meetings periodically to focus on trust building or to learn and discuss needed new information.  Therefore, the Circle adds one day to its spring meeting each year to allow for an annual retreat, reflection, training or enrichment.  

Annual Report

 

To hold itself accountable to its constituencies, the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) will produce an annual report of its activities, as well as the work of its committees and special projects, and circulate that report widely in South Dakota.  The annual report is drafted in time for the Circle’s fall meeting and finalized at its winter meeting.

Committees

Executive Committee

 

The Executive Committee is composed of the elected Leadership of the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle). The Executive Committee is responsible for setting meeting time and places, and the agenda, and assigning tasks to members and others when necessary.

At least one month prior to every meeting, the Executive Committee must develop and implement a plan to ensure maximum attendance by members (for example, dividing up the membership and personally calling each member).

 

Except for the power to amend this document, the Executive Committee has all of the powers and authority of the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) in the interval between meetings, subject to the direction and control of the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle).

Other Standing Committees

In addition to the Executive Committee, the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) has nine standing committees. The “Areas of Focus” in this document describes their mandates.

·        ICWA Implementation and Compliance Committee.

·        Legislative Review and Development Committee.

·        Service and Stability Committee.

·        Placement Resources Committee.

·        Education, Training, and Public Relations Committee.

·        Regional Collaboratives Support Committee.

·        Resource Development and Finance Committee.

·        Reconciliation[2]/Trust Building Committee.

·        Membership Recruitment and Retention Committee.

Other Committees

The Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) has the authority to create any other standing or ad hoc committees as needed.

Amendment Procedures

 

This document may be amended when necessary by a two-thirds majority vote of the members of the Collaborative Hocoka (Circle)

 



[1] The Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) has asked this Committee to submit a recommendation for a new name.

[2] The Collaborative Hocoka (Circle) has asked this Committee to submit a recommendation for a new name.